Business

DOJ to Summon FTX Clients, Investors, and Employees – Crypto News

Published

2 years ago

October 1, 2023

Dripp

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has confirmed its intent to bring forward former FTX customers, investors, and employees in the imminent trial against Sam Bankman-Fried, former FTX executive. Hence, the testimony will spotlight how these witnesses perceived their relationship with Bankman-Fried and his enterprise. Their interpretation of FTX’s approach towards customer assets will also be vital.

DOJ’s Challenges Arise in International Testimonies

Significantly, these testimonies aim to offer insights into the interactions between the defendant and these witnesses. This move also includes their understanding of Bankman-Fried’s statements and actions, especially about FTX’s handling of assets. The DOJ plans to spotlight retail and institutional clients who transferred considerable assets to FTX, believing the platform would securely custody them.

Moreover, unique witness situations have arisen with one of the DOJ’s witnesses, “FTX Customer-1”, based in Ukraine. Consequently, because of the ongoing war, travel to the U.S. for testimony poses challenges. Hence, the DOJ has proposed video conferencing as an alternative. However, Bankman-Fried’s defense has yet to nod to this motion.

SBF’s Defense Voices Concerns

However, the defense team for Bankman-Fried, led by attorney Mark Cohen, has expressed apprehensions regarding the proposed jury questions by the DOJ. These queries imply Bankman-Fried’s guilt, jeopardizing the essence of “innocent until proven guilty.

Besides this, the defense argues that these questions might not reveal jurors’ underlying biases, mainly if linked to personal experiences with cryptocurrencies. Furthermore, specific questions could lead the jury rather than extract genuine insights, potentially skewing the trial’s fairness.

As the jury selection process is set to commence on October 3, with the trial immediately following, all eyes are on this high-stakes legal showdown. This case, besides its immediate implications, also emphasizes the critical role of clear communication and objective questioning in ensuring justice.