US Banking Leaders Vie for Spot Bitcoin ETF Custodianship in Joint Valentine’s Day Letter to the SEC – Crypto News – Crypto News
Connect with us
U.S. Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) Opens Potential Bitcoin Spot ETFs to Public Opinion U.S. Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) Opens Potential Bitcoin Spot ETFs to Public Opinion

others

US Banking Leaders Vie for Spot Bitcoin ETF Custodianship in Joint Valentine’s Day Letter to the SEC – Crypto News

Published

1 year ago

on

US banking giants are writing a joint letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) arguing for spot Bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded fund (ETF) custodianship.

The letter, which was sent on Valentine’s Day by four industry leaders, addresses SEC Chairman Gary Gensler and asks him to modify a law passed in 2022 (SAB No. 121) that regulates crypto custodianship in light of several key developments, such as the approval of spot market BTC ETFs.

According to Thomson Reuters, SAB No. 121 forces entities safeguarding digital assets to present them on their balance sheet at a fair value.

However, the Bank Policy Institute American, the Bankers Association, the Financial Services Forum, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association all say that SAB No. 121 hinders their ability to participate.

“Since SAB 121 was issued in 2022, the Associations have articulated their concerns regarding the bulletin to the Commission both in writing and in meetings with Commission staff.

The foremost concern identified and discussed is how the on-balance sheet requirement of SAB 121 negatively impacts U.S. banking organizations and investors due to the associated prudential implications.

The Associations have underscored that on-balance sheet treatment will preclude highly regulated banking organizations from providing a custodial solution for digital assets at scale.

Moreover, the Associations have highlighted that the on-balance sheet requirement, coupled with the overly broad definition of ‘crypto asset’ in SAB 121, will have a chilling effect on banking organizations’ ability to develop responsible use cases for distributed ledger technology (DLT) more broadly.”

As a solution, the groups propose narrowing down the definition of “crypto asset” as well as exempting banking organizations from having to list the assets on-sheet but maintaining the disclosure requirements.

“Exempting banking organizations from the on-balance sheet treatment but requiring them to make certain disclosures about their digital activity would mitigate the concerns raised by banking organizations without undermining the goal of SAB 121 to promote disclosures to investors.”

Don’t Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox

Check Price Action

Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Telegram

Surf The Daily Hodl Mix

Check Latest News Headlines

&nbsp

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed at The Daily Hodl are not investment advice. Investors should do their due diligence before making any high-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrency or digital assets. Please be advised that your transfers and trades are at your own risk, and any loses you may incur are your responsibility. The Daily Hodl does not recommend the buying or selling of any cryptocurrencies or digital assets, nor is The Daily Hodl an investment advisor. Please note that The Daily Hodl participates in affiliate marketing.

Featured Image: Shutterstock/Art Furnace

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending