{"id":155403,"date":"2023-09-14T01:41:13","date_gmt":"2023-09-13T20:11:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/?p=155403"},"modified":"2023-09-14T01:41:13","modified_gmt":"2023-09-13T20:11:13","slug":"paxos-confirms-its-responsible-for-500k-mistaken-bitcoin-transaction-crypto-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/paxos-confirms-its-responsible-for-500k-mistaken-bitcoin-transaction-crypto-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Paxos confirms it\u2019s responsible for $500K mistaken Bitcoin transaction &#8211; Crypto News"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-v-281e09ba=\"\">\n<p>The account that overpaid $500,000 in fees on Sept. 10 for a Bitcoin transfer belonged to Paxos, according to a Sept. 13 statement from the company. Paxos claimed that end users have not been affected and all user funds are safe. Paxos is most well-known as the issuer of stablecoins, including PayPal USD (<a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cointelegraph.com\/paypal-pyusd-price-index\">PYUSD<\/a>) and Pax Dollar (USDP), but also runs a crypto brokerage firm that carries Bitcoin (<a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cointelegraph.com\/bitcoin-price\">BTC<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>The statement comes after users on X (formerly Twitter) were speculating that PayPal may have been responsible for the transaction due to a related wallet account that had been identified by analytics platform OXT as belonging to PayPal. A Paxos representative told Cointelegraph that PayPal was not responsible, as the error was its own, stating:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cPaxos overpaid the BTC network fee on Sept. 10, 2023. This only impacted Paxos corporate operations. Paxos clients and end users have not been affected and all customer funds are safe. This was due to a bug on a single transfer and it has been fixed. Paxos is in contact with the miner to recoup the funds.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The mistaken transaction was first discovered on Sept. 10, shortly after it had occurred. According to blockchain data, the sender <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/blockchair.com\/bitcoin\/transaction\/d5392d474b4c436e1c9d1f4ff4be5f5f9bb0eb2e26b61d2781751474b7e870fd\">paid<\/a> fees of approximately 20 BTC (over $515,000 worth at the time) to send just 0.07 BTC (worth less than $2,000 at the time). At the time, Casa wallet co-founder Jameson Lopp <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/lopp\/status\/1700985810714239222\">declared<\/a> that the sending account \u201clooks like an exchange or payment processor with buggy software,\u201d as it had made over 60,000 transactions from the same address.<\/p>\n<p>The block that contained the transaction was confirmed by Bitcoin mining pool F2Pool. On Sept. 10, the pool\u2019s management <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/satofishi\/status\/1701042302238724512\">offered<\/a>\u00a0to return the funds to whoever sent the transaction if a claim was made within three days. Otherwise, the exorbitant fee would be paid out to the pool\u2019s hashing power contributors.<\/p>\n<p>Before Paxos made its statement, Bitcoin enthusiast Mononaut declared on X that PayPal was responsible for the transaction.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\"> BREAKING <br \/>The fat fingers belong to PayPal <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/pKN0w5SfKB\">https:\/\/t.co\/pKN0w5SfKB<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 mononaut (@mononautical) <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/mononautical\/status\/1701968059597042077?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">September 13, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>According to Mononaut, the sending account, bc1qr35hws365juz5rtlsjtvmulu97957kqvr3zpw3, had exhibited behavior that \u201cclosely matches the behavior of a now inactive wallet [bc1qhs3gptkxem5y7yaq2yg0un2m8hae6wt87gkx4n].\u201d This inactive address was <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/oxt.me\/address\/bc1qhs3gptkxem5y7yaq2yg0un2m8hae6wt87gkx4n\">labeled<\/a> \u201cPaypal\u201d by blockchain analytics platform OXT.<\/p>\n<p>To add further evidence for their hypothesis, Mononaut pointed out that this old wallet address transferred its funds to the new address through an intermediate account. Bitcoin blockchain data shows that the old address labeled \u201cPaypal\u201d by OXT <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/mempool.space\/tx\/b7754e398d2ab2d2ac4c99d57146e6221293584a12eeacc8977f2a3f321e01e7\">transferred<\/a> approximately 18.5 BTC to address bc1qlm0xlahpysq2v9yh5rhcc430xjz3xknqqnyvaf on June 19. That account then <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/mempool.space\/tx\/b3d82c69b6230f06d494d6b83ee89972fa292af79add218a69e19bff8f570cac\">sent<\/a> \u200earound 5.37 BTC to the new address that later made the mistaken transaction. Lopp shared the thread, <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/lopp\/status\/1701977916345548969\">wondering<\/a> aloud if PayPal would request the funds back.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Related: <\/strong><a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cointelegraph.com\/news\/coinbase-bitcoin-lightning-network-integration-brian-armstrong\" data-amp=\"https:\/\/cointelegraph-com.cdn.ampproject.org\/c\/s\/cointelegraph.com\/news\/coinbase-bitcoin-lightning-network-integration-brian-armstrong\/amp\"><strong>Coinbase to integrate Bitcoin Lightning Network: CEO Brian Armstrong<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<p>Paxos later issued its statement confirming that the mistake had been its own, not PayPal\u2019s.<\/p>\n<p>Paxos isn\u2019t the first crypto user or company to potentially pay thousands of dollars in fees because of a mistake. In 2019, one Ethereum user lost over $300,000 when they\u00a0<a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cointelegraph.com\/news\/ethereum-user-who-accidentally-paid-365-000-fee-splits-loss-with-mining-pool-sparkpool\" data-amp=\"https:\/\/cointelegraph-com.cdn.ampproject.org\/c\/s\/cointelegraph.com\/news\/ethereum-user-who-accidentally-paid-365-000-fee-splits-loss-with-mining-pool-sparkpool\/amp\">mistakenly pasted values<\/a> into the wrong fields. Luckily for them, the mining pool agreed to return 50% of the funds lost. In 2020, another Ethereum user <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cointelegraph.com\/news\/i-destroyed-my-life-uniswap-trader-spends-9-500-in-fees-on-120-transaction\" data-amp=\"https:\/\/cointelegraph-com.cdn.ampproject.org\/c\/s\/cointelegraph.com\/news\/i-destroyed-my-life-uniswap-trader-spends-9-500-in-fees-on-120-transaction\/amp\">mistakenly paid $9,500<\/a> for a $120 trade. The user claimed that the mistake had \u201cdestroyed [their] life.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In its statement, Paxos claimed that it had contacted the mining company that confirmed the transaction and is attempting to recover the lost funds.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The account that overpaid $500,000 in fees on Sept. 10 for a Bitcoin transfer belonged to Paxos, according to a Sept. 13 statement from the company. Paxos claimed that end users have not been affected and all user funds are safe. Paxos is most well-known as the issuer of stablecoins, including PayPal USD (PYUSD) and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":155404,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[235,203,210,234,231,232,237,238,236,233],"class_list":["post-155403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blockchain","tag-bitcoin","tag-crypto-currency","tag-elon-musk","tag-ethereum","tag-hyperledger","tag-ibm","tag-mining","tag-nodes","tag-spacex","tag-tesla"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155403"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155403\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":155406,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/155403\/revisions\/155406"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/155404"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}