<\/p>\n
For those who haven\u2019t seen the reality show \u201cJury Duty,\u201d please watch it. If you don\u2019t trust my taste in television, it is nominated for two Emmys.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Without spoilers, the comic reality show pretends to cover jury selection and a run-of-the-mill trial \u2014 what one juror doesn\u2019t know, however, is that every single person in the courtroom, from the judge to the bailiffs to all of his fellow jurors, are actors. Jury selection is fake, the trial is fake, it\u2019s all a set-up. Because it\u2019s a reality-show-cum-documentary, the show keeps putting weirder and weirder scenarios in front of this one juror to see how he reacts.<\/p>\n
The current criminal trial of FTX ex-CEO Sam Bankman-Fried<\/a> has more in common with this reality show than you\u2019d expect.\u00a0<\/p>\n In one case, a lone, unaware juror is grappling with the absurdities that unseen producers keep throwing at him as he tries to keep his cool during trial.\u00a0<\/p>\n In another, I\u2019m trying to keep my cool as I grapple with the absurdities that the judge, defense and prosecution throw at each other during Bankman-Fried\u2019s trial.<\/p>\n Comparisons between the two trials are almost too easy. In the fake trial show, one juror keeps falling asleep during important parts of witness testimony. The audience is supposed to laugh at the ridiculousness of the situation, but also understand that this is an abnormality. This trial, although fake, decides the outcome of a man\u2019s freedom \u2014\u00a0and the jury is responsible for the verdict. Being awake for the trial is an obvious prerequisite.<\/p>\n But during Bankman-Fried\u2019s trial, more than one juror has dozed off<\/a>. By some counts, no fewer than three jurors have been fast asleep while the witnesses gave their testimony. This is real life, not reality TV, but the jurors still can\u2019t keep their eyes open.<\/p>\n Another easy similarity \u2014\u00a0the inclusion of a celebrity guest with a big personality for the laughs. Reality show \u201cJury Duty\u201d has James Marsden playing an obnoxious version of himself. And the Bankman-Fried trial has its own celebrity guest in the form of the OC\u2019s Ben McKenzie.<\/p>\n Sure, he\u2019s not as bad as Marsden (who plays a juror causing drama by calling the paparazzi on himself in an attempt to get himself recused). But McKenzie does somehow, magically, manage to bypass the journalist horde that waits for courtroom seats starting at 4:30 am to get his own cozy seat closer to the front. Very different celebrities, very different trials \u2014 yet both manage to infuriate everyone around them.<\/p>\n Then, the resemblance between comedy and reality gets more serious.<\/p>\n The defense lawyer on \u201cJury Duty\u201d turns out to be so terrible that the defendant fires him, and he ends up representing himself. While Sam Bankman-Fried hasn\u2019t fired his lawyers (yet), his defense team in general has made enough missteps that they\u2019ve prompted a flurry of articles<\/a> questioning their abilities.<\/p>\n Read more:<\/strong> Is Sam Bankman-Fried\u2019s defense dropping the ball?<\/a><\/p>\n Judge Lewis Kaplan has continuously chastised Bankman-Fried\u2019s team with snide remarks in a mocking tone that many journalists didn\u2019t even know was allowed, leading to giggles from the gallery and more recently, shushing of the media section by the court bailiffs.<\/p>\n But it\u2019s not just the defense dropping the ball in such a public and comedic manner. This week, Kaplan also chastised the prosecution for bringing in an expert in Google metadata from Texas \u2014 only for the defense to immediately get him to admit that he was not, in fact, an expert on metadata.<\/p>\n \u201cLawyers are supposed to do better than this, and I\u2019m talking to both sides,\u201d the judge told the room<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n All of this is to say \u2014 while it\u2019s a total coincidence that Bankman-Fried\u2019s criminal trial so closely resembles a comedic fake trial for an Emmy-nominated reality show, it does speak to the absurdity of the entire FTX saga.<\/p>\n If the creators of \u201cJury Duty\u201d seek comedic inspiration for their next story, they might not need to look further than the Southern District of New York.<\/p>\n I don\u2019t care much about tech, I don\u2019t care a whole lot about finance, either. I care about writing stories and watching weird things unfold. And that\u2019s why I\u2019ve ended up in crypto. <\/em><\/p>\n But because I\u2019m missing that passion for what crypto and blockchain are all about \u2014 finance, tech, privacy, yadda yadda \u2014 I\u2019m going to write instead about what I am actually interested in. Everything about crypto that has very little to do with crypto.<\/p>\n That\u2019s what this column will be about. All the tangential stories that come out of the blockchain and crypto space, what I think about them, and how I navigate it all as a skeptical former Russian literature major.<\/p>\n It\u2019s precisely my perch as an outsider that lets me do what I do: Opine on all sides of any crypto issue, no strings attached, no skin in the game.<\/p>\n If you want to talk crypto with me, let\u2019s go off topic.<\/p>\n Don\u2019t miss the next big story \u2013 join our\u00a0free daily newsletter<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
\n