<\/p>\n
WASHINGTON \u2014 The Supreme Court<\/a> on Tuesday seemed likely to grant tech giant Cisco’s bid to shut down a lawsuit claiming that the company\u2019s technology was used to persecute members of the Falun Gong spiritual movement in China.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The justices are reviewing an appellate ruling that would allow the lawsuit against Cisco to go forward in U.S. courts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The company argues that it cannot be held liable under two separate laws for aiding and abetting human rights violations. The laws are the 18th-century Alien Tort Statute and the Torture Victim Protection Act , first enacted in 1991.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The main questions among the court’s conservative majority seemed to be how broadly to rule for Cisco and whether lower courts are allowing too many similar suits to proceed. Justice Neil Gorsuch at one point asked whether the courthouse door is \u201cnot closely guarded.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In recent years, the Supreme Court and presidential administrations of both parties have been skeptical of lawsuits seeking to use U.S. courts as a venue to seek justice over the acts of foreign governments, especially those that took place abroad. To try to overcome that skepticism, Falun Gong members have argued that a substantial portion of Cisco\u2019s activities involving China took place in the United States.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n An Associated Press investigation last year<\/a> showed that American tech companies, to a large degree, designed and built China\u2019s surveillance state, encouraged by Republican and Democratic administrations, even as activists warned such tools were being used to quash dissent<\/a>, persecute religious groups<\/a> and target minorities<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In 2008, documents leaked to the press showed Cisco saw the \u201cGolden Shield,\u201d China’s internet censorship effort, as a sales opportunity. The company quoted a Chinese official calling the Falun Gong an \u201cevil cult.\u201d A Cisco presentation reviewed by from the same year said its products could identify over 90% of Falun Gong material on the web.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Other presentations reviewed by show that Cisco represented Falun Gong material as a \u201cthreat\u201d and built out a national information system to track Falun Gong believers. In 2011, Falun Gong members sued Cisco, alleging the company tailored technology for Beijing that it knew would be used to track, detain and torture believers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson seemed most willing to allow the lawsuit to continue.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Cisco was a willing partner with the Chinese government, Sotomayor said. “It knew that those people will be tortured,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Not true, said Cisco lawyer Kannon Shanmugam. “Cisco vigorously disputes those allegations,\u201d Shanmugam told the justices.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n A decision is expected late June.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" WASHINGTON \u2014 The Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed likely to grant tech giant Cisco’s bid to shut down a lawsuit claiming that the company\u2019s technology was used to persecute members of the Falun Gong spiritual movement in China. The justices are reviewing an appellate ruling that would allow the lawsuit against Cisco to go forward […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":423727,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[188,183,3426,185,186,46861,46862,25270,187,184,189,149,150,182,190],"class_list":["post-425772","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technology","tag-blockchain-tech","tag-blockchain-technology","tag-cisco","tag-crypto-technology","tag-cryptocurrency-technology","tag-falun-gong","tag-human-rights-violations","tag-lawsuit","tag-metaverse-technology","tag-nft-technology","tag-soul-bound-token","tag-supreme-court","tag-tech","tag-technology","tag-token-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/425772","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=425772"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/425772\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":425775,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/425772\/revisions\/425775"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/423727"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=425772"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=425772"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=425772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}