{"id":429145,"date":"2026-06-02T05:07:36","date_gmt":"2026-06-01T23:37:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/failed-ethereum-ico-from-2016-just-unlocked-1003-eth-by-exploiting-itself-crypto-news\/"},"modified":"2026-06-02T06:42:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-02T01:12:42","slug":"failed-ethereum-ico-from-2016-just-unlocked-1003-eth-by-exploiting-itself-crypto-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/failed-ethereum-ico-from-2016-just-unlocked-1003-eth-by-exploiting-itself-crypto-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Failed Ethereum ICO from 2016 just unlocked 1,003 ETH by exploiting itself &#8211; Crypto News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>A white-hat researcher&#8217;s recovery of 1,003.62 ETH from a failed 2016 <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/news\/ethereum\/\">Ethereum<\/a> ICO has turned an old smart contract flaw into a reminder that Ethereum&#8217;s earliest technical decisions can remain live for nearly a decade.<\/p>\n<p>The researcher, known as <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/0xFlorent_\/status\/2061070356564091258\">0xFlorent<\/a>, said he unlocked the ETH from the HongCoin contract after the funds had been trapped for nine years. Using a June 1 <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/coins\/ethereum\/\">Ethereum<\/a> price of roughly $1,983, the recovered amount was worth about $1.99 million.<\/p>\n<p>The recovery depended on the original HongCoin multisig. The <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/etherscan.io\/address\/0x9fa8fa61a10ff892e4ebceb7f4e0fc684c2ce0a9\">HongCoin contract<\/a> still required action from that management path for the relevant admin calls.<\/p>\n<p>That made the episode closer to contract archaeology than to a conventional exploit: the same immutable code that preserved the refund failure also preserved a forgotten route around it.<\/p>\n<div class=\"cs-article-embed\"> <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/someone-drained-long-forgotten-ethereum-wallets-and-the-cause-may-trace-back-years\/\" class=\"cs-article-embed__link\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"cs-article-embed__media\"> <noscript><\/noscript><img class=\"lazyload\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/dormant-ethereum-wallet-drained-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"Someone just drained long-forgotten dormant Ethereum wallets, and the cause may trace back years\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\/><\/div>\n<div class=\"cs-article-embed__body\"> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__related-reading\">Related Reading<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"cs-article-embed__title\">Someone just drained long-forgotten dormant Ethereum wallets, and the cause may trace back years<\/h3>\n<p>Hundreds of long-inactive Ethereum wallets were swept into a tagged address while researchers and users still debate whether old keys, weak wallet tooling, or another exposure opened the door.<\/p>\n<p> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__meta-item\">May 1, 2026<\/span> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__meta-divider\">\u00b7<\/span> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__meta-item\">Liam &#8216;Akiba&#8217; Wright<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <\/a><\/div>\n<p>HongCoin&#8217;s contrast is stark. Ethereum&#8217;s base layer stayed still. A still-valid permission path and coordinated signing from the original multisig made 48 original investors eligible to claim funds through a refund mechanism that had been broken for years.<\/p>\n<h2>How the refund path broke<\/h2>\n<p>HongCoin was a 2016 Ethereum project whose public repository described it as a <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/hongcoin\/DO\">decentralized venture fund<\/a>. The token sale failed to reach its funding goal, and contributors were supposed to be able to reclaim their ETH through the contract&#8217;s refund function.<\/p>\n<p>The problem sat inside the contract&#8217;s accounting. In the <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/raw.githubusercontent.com\/hongcoin\/DO\/master\/HongCoin.sol\">HongCoin source code<\/a>, the <code>refundMyIcoInvestment()<\/code> function checks whether the caller&#8217;s token balance is greater than <code>tokensCreated<\/code>. If that condition is true, the refund call fails.<\/p>\n<p>If it passes, the function zeroes the caller&#8217;s token balance, clears related accounting, reduces <code>tokensCreated<\/code> by that token balance, and then sends the refund.<\/p>\n<p>Over time, earlier refunds reduced the global <code>tokensCreated<\/code> counter. That left larger holders in a strange position: they still had balances tied to their original claims, but those balances could be too large for the contract&#8217;s remaining counter.<\/p>\n<p>The refund function then treated them as invalid, blocking the very users it was supposed to repay.<\/p>\n<p>The escape path was another old piece of code. The multisig-restricted <code>mgmtIssueBountyToken()<\/code> admin function could add a supplied amount to a recipient&#8217;s balance and to <code>bountyTokensCreated<\/code>.<\/p>\n<p>That path belonged to the management side of the contract, which is why the original multisig had to participate. Modern <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/docs.solidity.org\/en\/latest\/control-structures.html\">Solidity arithmetic<\/a> reverts by default on overflow.<\/p>\n<p>Before Solidity 0.8.0, arithmetic wrapped on overflow unless developers added their own checks. The older behavior shaped the escape route.<\/p>\n<p>0xFlorent identified a way to use the admin function&#8217;s arithmetic behavior to reset a holder&#8217;s balance low enough for the refund check to pass. The result was paradoxical: one stale bug helped undo the practical damage caused by another stale bug.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Stage<\/th>\n<th>Key detail<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>2016 token sale<\/td>\n<td>HongCoin collected ETH for a venture-fund-style Ethereum project that later failed to reach its goal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Refund failure<\/td>\n<td>The refund function rejected larger holders once the global token counter fell below their balances.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Old admin path<\/td>\n<td>A multisig-restricted function still existed that could change balances using pre-0.8 Solidity arithmetic behavior.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Whitehat recovery<\/td>\n<td>0xFlorent coordinated with the original HongCoin multisig to make blocked holders eligible to claim funds.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>On-chain proof<\/td>\n<td>A May 29 transaction shows a successful <code>refundMyIcoInvestment()<\/code> call producing an internal 96 ETH transfer.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ig_0daa150018935898016a1d8beead948191ad60ad4a7c44317e-1.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-539067 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ig_0daa150018935898016a1d8beead948191ad60ad4a7c44317e-1.png\" alt=\"Flow diagram showing how HongCoin's 2016 failed ICO, refund accounting bug, original multisig, and integer-overflow path unlocked 1,003.62 ETH.\" width=\"1122\" height=\"1402\"\/><\/noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload aligncenter wp-image-539067 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ig_0daa150018935898016a1d8beead948191ad60ad4a7c44317e-1.png\" alt=\"Flow diagram showing how HongCoin's 2016 failed ICO, refund accounting bug, original multisig, and integer-overflow path unlocked 1,003.62 ETH.\" width=\"1122\" height=\"1402\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<h2>The multisig made it a coordinated recovery<\/h2>\n<p>The multisig requirement set a boundary for the HongCoin recovery. The sensitive path required HongCoin&#8217;s original management address to execute the relevant calls, so the practical recovery depended on cooperation between the researcher and the old control path.<\/p>\n<p>The coordination carried as much weight as the code. The recovery involved 41 signed transactions for blocked holders, while another seven smaller holders could refund directly without the workaround.<\/p>\n<p>The ICO began on Aug. 29, 2016, ended on Oct. 28, 2016, and failed to meet its funding goal.<\/p>\n<p>The on-chain record already shows refund activity. A May 29 <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/etherscan.io\/tx\/0xb25a15802a121c8564fd65caaba88c642795f5d15abb1af62b2b54e3f774563d\">on-chain transaction<\/a> called <code>refundMyIcoInvestment()<\/code> and produced an internal transfer of 96 ETH from the HongCoin contract to an investor address.<\/p>\n<p>The top-level transaction value was 0 ETH because the actual movement happened inside the contract call.<\/p>\n<p>Anyone following the money should separate eligibility from completed distribution. The contract state and multisig execution reopened a claim path for funds that had been inaccessible for years.<\/p>\n<p>The visible on-chain examples show refund activity rather than a full accounting of every eligible investor&#8217;s claim.<\/p>\n<p>The HongCoin case should be read carefully before anyone generalizes it to other old stuck funds. The ingredients were unusually specific: identifiable contract logic, an admin function still usable by the original control path, a whitehat willing to coordinate, and enough remaining on-chain value to make the effort worthwhile.<\/p>\n<p>The practical detail is ownership and permission. The old function could change balances, but only the management path could call it.<\/p>\n<p>That gives the recovery its ethical and operational boundary: outside research found the path, original signers executed it, and the claim route reopened for investors.<\/p>\n<div id=\"cs-inline-newsletter-6a1dda7e520c1\" class=\"cs-inline-newsletter\" data-inline-newsletter=\"\">\n<div class=\"cs-inline-newsletter__inner\">\n<div class=\"cs-inline-newsletter__content\"> <span class=\"cs-inline-newsletter__eyebrow\">CryptoSlate Daily Brief<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"cs-inline-newsletter__title\">Daily signals, zero noise.<\/h3>\n<p class=\"cs-inline-newsletter__copy\">Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.<\/p>\n<p> <span><i class=\"fa-regular fa-bolt\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\/> 5-minute digest<\/span> <span><i class=\"fa-regular fa-star\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\/> 100k+ readers<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"cs-inline-newsletter__form-shell\">\n<p class=\"cs-inline-newsletter__privacy\">Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.<\/p>\n<p> <i class=\"fa-regular fa-circle-xmark\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\/> <span>Whoops, looks like there was a problem. Please try again.<\/span><\/p>\n<p> <i class=\"fa-regular fa-circle-check\" aria-hidden=\"true\"\/> <span>You\u2019re subscribed. Welcome aboard.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"cs-article-embed\"> <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/aave-says-creditors-are-trying-to-seize-stolen-eth-before-victims-get-their-71m-back\/\" class=\"cs-article-embed__link\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"cs-article-embed__media\"> <noscript><img width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/ethereum-court-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"Aave warns $71M exploit recovery could be seized before victims are repaid\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\/><\/noscript><img class=\"lazyload\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/ethereum-court-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"Aave warns $71M exploit recovery could be seized before victims are repaid\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\/><\/div>\n<div class=\"cs-article-embed__body\"> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__related-reading\">Related Reading<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"cs-article-embed__title\">Aave warns $71M exploit recovery could be seized before victims are repaid<\/h3>\n<p>The dispute could decide whether DeFi recovery funds go back to users first or become targets for outside creditors.<\/p>\n<p> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__meta-item\">May 5, 2026<\/span> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__meta-divider\">\u00b7<\/span> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__meta-item\">Gino Matos<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <\/a><\/div>\n<p>The same facts also make the case hard to generalize. Many dormant contracts lack an active control key, a clean claimant set, or a public trail that makes responsible recovery plausible.<\/p>\n<p>That boundary also reduces the temptation to treat the episode as a broad exploit template. The technical mechanism explains why the refund gate reopened, but the story&#8217;s consequence comes from the combination of old code, living permissions, and public settlement.<\/p>\n<p>Similar archaeology becomes riskier when a contract lacks one of those elements, because discovery can expose a weakness before it creates a usable recovery route.<\/p>\n<h2>Ethereum keeps the mistake and the remedy<\/h2>\n<p>The broader Ethereum history makes the HongCoin recovery more than a curiosity. A 2025 <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/insights\/over-3-4-billion-in-ethereum-lost-forever-due-to-user-mistakes-and-contract-bugs\/\">analysis citing Coinbase&#8217;s Conor Grogan<\/a> put permanently lost ETH at more than 913,111, framed as a conservative estimate across user and contract-related errors.<\/p>\n<p>That category includes funds sent to burn addresses, contract bugs, and major historical incidents.<\/p>\n<p>Some of Ethereum&#8217;s most consequential early moments were also recovery debates. In 2016, the <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.ethereum.org\/2016\/07\/20\/hard-fork-completed\">DAO hard fork<\/a> moved roughly 12 million ETH from DAO-related contracts into a recovery contract after the network&#8217;s defining governance crisis.<\/p>\n<p>In 2017, Parity Technologies&#8217; multisig library self-destruct incident <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/paritytech\/a-postmortem-on-the-parity-multi-sig-library-self-destruct-63daca3a4cf7\">blocked 513,774.16 ETH<\/a> across 587 wallets.<\/p>\n<p>Those episodes were larger and politically heavier than HongCoin. They still help frame why this smaller recovery resonates.<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ig_0daa150018935898016a1d8c8485fc81919fab8fd1f05ce849-1.png\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-539068 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ig_0daa150018935898016a1d8c8485fc81919fab8fd1f05ce849-1.png\" alt=\"Timeline matrix showing Ethereum stuck-fund history, including The DAO, Parity, lost ETH estimates, and the 2026 security endowment plan.\" width=\"1122\" height=\"1402\"\/><\/noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload aligncenter wp-image-539068 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ig_0daa150018935898016a1d8c8485fc81919fab8fd1f05ce849-1.png\" alt=\"Timeline matrix showing Ethereum stuck-fund history, including The DAO, Parity, lost ETH estimates, and the 2026 security endowment plan.\" width=\"1122\" height=\"1402\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ethereum&#8217;s promise that code and state persist is a security property and a memory system. It preserves errors, half-forgotten assumptions, old permissions, and the occasional remedy whose future relevance was invisible at deployment.<\/p>\n<div class=\"cs-article-embed\"> <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/thedaos-leftover-rescue-money-sat-for-a-decade-now-its-becoming-ethereums-permanent-security-budget\/\" class=\"cs-article-embed__link\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"cs-article-embed__media\"> <noscript><img width=\"1024\" height=\"538\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/ethereum-vault-1024x538.jpg\" alt=\"TheDAO\u2019s leftover rescue money sat for a decade now it\u2019s becoming Ethereum\u2019s permanent $220M security budget\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\/><\/noscript><img class=\"lazyload\" width=\"1024\" height=\"538\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/ethereum-vault-1024x538.jpg\" alt=\"TheDAO\u2019s leftover rescue money sat for a decade now it\u2019s becoming Ethereum\u2019s permanent $220M security budget\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\/><\/div>\n<div class=\"cs-article-embed__body\"> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__related-reading\">Related Reading<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"cs-article-embed__title\">TheDAO\u2019s leftover rescue money sat for a decade now it\u2019s becoming Ethereum\u2019s permanent $220M security budget<\/h3>\n<p>Veterans want to stake 69,420 ETH from leftover 2016 recovery funds, generating millions yearly for smart contract security.<\/p>\n<p> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__meta-item\">Jan 30, 2026<\/span> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__meta-divider\">\u00b7<\/span> <span class=\"cs-article-embed__meta-item\">Gino Matos<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <\/a><\/div>\n<p>That long memory now sits beside a maturing security culture. In January, Ethereum veterans <a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/thedaos-leftover-rescue-money-sat-for-a-decade-now-its-becoming-ethereums-permanent-security-budget\/\">announced plans<\/a> to convert roughly 75,000 ETH in leftover TheDAO recovery funds into a staked endowment for Ethereum security.<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic.jpg\"><noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-539044 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic.jpg\" alt=\"Comic-style image of an Ethereum treasure chest marked HongCoin ICO, showing explorers recovering 1,003.62 ETH.\" width=\"1280\" height=\"720\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-480x270.jpg 480w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-1200x675.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"\/><\/noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload aligncenter wp-image-539044 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic.jpg\" alt=\"Comic-style image of an Ethereum treasure chest marked HongCoin ICO, showing explorers recovering 1,003.62 ETH.\" width=\"1280\" height=\"720\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic.jpg 1280w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-480x270.jpg 480w, https:\/\/cryptoslate.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/ethereum-comic-1200x675.jpg 1200w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 1280px) 100vw, 1280px\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The HongCoin case works on a much smaller scale, but points to the same afterlife of early Ethereum decisions.<\/p>\n<p>The next test is recoverability: whether other old contracts contain paths that can be used responsibly. A white-hat recovery needs more than a bug. It needs a rightful control path, public on-chain evidence, careful disclosure, and a way to avoid turning contract archaeology into a playbook for opportunistic attacks.<\/p>\n<p>HongCoin shows that some trapped funds can remain suspended inside old logic, waiting for someone to understand both the flaw and the permission structure around it. That is a hopeful result for the 48 investors now eligible to claim.<\/p>\n<p>It is also a warning for the rest of the ecosystem: Ethereum remembers bad code, and sometimes it remembers the escape hatch too.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A white-hat researcher&#8217;s recovery of 1,003.62 ETH from a failed 2016 Ethereum ICO has turned an old smart contract flaw into a reminder that Ethereum&#8217;s earliest technical decisions can remain live for nearly a decade. The researcher, known as 0xFlorent, said he unlocked the ETH from the HongCoin contract after the funds had been trapped [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":429156,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[230,225,221,227,226,228,229,60,223,224,222],"class_list":["post-429145","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cryptocurrency","tag-brave","tag-coinbase","tag-crypto","tag-decentralised","tag-decentralized","tag-decentralized-exchange","tag-erc-20","tag-featured","tag-meme-coin","tag-robinhood","tag-solana"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=429145"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429145\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":429157,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/429145\/revisions\/429157"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/429156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=429145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=429145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=429145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}