{"id":430468,"date":"2026-06-12T23:00:40","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T17:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/xrp-aims-for-0-90-as-etf-demand-battles-selling-pressure-from-whales-crypto-news\/"},"modified":"2026-06-12T23:05:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-12T17:35:12","slug":"xrp-aims-for-0-90-as-etf-demand-battles-selling-pressure-from-whales-crypto-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/xrp-aims-for-0-90-as-etf-demand-battles-selling-pressure-from-whales-crypto-news\/","title":{"rendered":"XRP aims for $0.90 as ETF demand battles selling pressure from whales – Crypto News"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\n

XRP is trading at $1.11, down roughly 17% from its June opening, having set a new 2026 low on June 5 and shed $8 billion in market cap over three sessions.<\/p>\n

The correction happens as the asset posted its strongest ETF inflow month of the year, with $131.94 million captured in May, ahead of both Bitcoin and Ethereum products.<\/p>\n

Glassnode’s June 9 data<\/a> points to loss realization as the primary pressure on XRP’s price, with the token’s 90-day realized profit-to-loss ratio falling to 0.38, meaning holders are booking roughly 38 cents in profit for every dollar of realized loss.<\/p>\n

At the speculative peak in 2025, that ratio reached 50, with gains outpacing losses by 50 to 1.
Glassnode described the current reading as intense capitulation, with XRP’s aggregate realized price sitting near $1.48, placing the average holder underwater at current prices.<\/p>\n

On the XRP<\/a> Ledger, the 90-day average of total fees paid fell from 5,900 XRP in February 2025 to 500 XRP by June 9, a 91.5% decline that Glassnode<\/a> attributed to a near-total contraction in organic transaction demand since the prior speculative phase ended.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Signal<\/th>\nLatest reading<\/th>\nDirection<\/th>\nWhat it means<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
XRP price<\/td>\n$1.11<\/strong><\/td>\nBearish<\/td>\nDown roughly 17% from June open and at fresh 2026 lows.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
May ETF inflows<\/td>\n$131.94M<\/strong><\/td>\nBullish<\/td>\nRegulated demand remains active despite price weakness.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
90-day realized profit\/loss ratio<\/td>\n0.38<\/strong><\/td>\nBearish<\/td>\nHolders are realizing far more losses than profits.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aggregate realized price<\/td>\n$1.48<\/strong><\/td>\nBearish<\/td>\nAverage holder is underwater at current prices.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
XRP Ledger fees<\/td>\n5,900 XRP \u2192 500 XRP<\/strong><\/td>\nBearish<\/td>\nOrganic transaction demand has collapsed 91.5%.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

What whales are actually doing<\/h2>\n

CryptoQuant\u2019s exchange<\/a>-flow analysis<\/a> shows XRP whale outflow dominance reached 91.4%<\/a> on Binance<\/a> and 90.5% across centralized exchanges.<\/p>\n

Whales dominate XRP’s exchange flows, and the data describes that structural control without resolving whether it reflects selling pressure or accumulation.<\/p>\n

A separate CryptoQuant<\/a> post frames declining XRP inflows to Binance as a possible sign of growing whale confidence<\/a>, arguing that subdued exchange inflows could keep available selling supply limited.<\/p>\n

Large-holder accumulation has historically preceded recoveries, and Glassnode’s loss-realization and fee data show that the current supply of loss-realizing sellers and the collapse in organic network demand are absorbing that accumulation before it reaches price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Data source<\/th>\nMetric<\/th>\nReading<\/th>\nBearish interpretation<\/th>\nBullish interpretation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
CryptoQuant<\/td>\nXRP whale outflow dominance on Binance<\/td>\n91.4%<\/strong><\/td>\nWhales dominate exchange flows, so large holders can pressure price.<\/td>\nOutflow dominance does not prove whales are selling into exchanges.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CryptoQuant<\/td>\nXRP whale outflow dominance across CEXs<\/td>\n90.5%<\/strong><\/td>\nCentralized-exchange flows are structurally whale-driven.<\/td>\nConcentrated flows may also reflect custody movement or accumulation behavior.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CryptoQuant<\/td>\nXRP inflows to Binance<\/td>\nDeclining<\/strong><\/td>\nWeak demand may reduce the need to send coins to exchanges.<\/td>\nLower inflows may mean reduced available selling supply.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santiment<\/td>\nWallets holding 10M+ XRP<\/td>\n45.83B XRP<\/strong><\/td>\nConcentration risk remains high.<\/td>\nLargest wallets held the most XRP since May 2018.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santiment<\/td>\nWallets holding 10K+ XRP<\/td>\n332,230<\/strong><\/td>\nAccumulation has not yet created a price floor.<\/td>\nMid-to-large wallet count reached an all-time high.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Santiment’s<\/a> May data note that wallets holding at least 10 million XRP controlled 45.83 billion XRP<\/a>, the most since May 2018. The number of wallets holding at least 10,000 XRP reached an all-time high of 332,230.<\/p>\n

Large-holder accumulation has historically preceded recoveries, and Glassnode’s loss-realization and fee data show that the current supply of loss-realizing sellers and the collapse in organic network demand are sufficient to absorb that accumulation without forming a price<\/a> floor.<\/p>\n

The ETF layer<\/h2>\n

Seven US spot XRP ETFs<\/a> are now live, holding approximately 923.7 million XRP in custody as of June 10, with combined AUM near $1 billion.<\/p>\n

Cumulative net inflows since the November 2025 launch have approached $1.45 billion, and May’s $131.94 million monthly inflow was the strongest since December and ran for 20 consecutive days before a $5.34 million outflow on June 3 broke the streak.<\/p>\n

CoinGlass ETF data show that regulated<\/a> demand for XRP exists and has been persistent<\/a>, while price action indicates that demand has been absorbed by spot market<\/a> selling or loss realization, without producing a sustained rebound.<\/p>\n

Standard Chartered<\/a> has projected $4 billion to $8 billion in XRP ETF inflows<\/a> for 2026 if the CLARITY Act passes, a figure far above cumulative inflows to date.<\/p>\n

That upside depends on a Senate floor vote, which Polymarket<\/a> currently prices at a 47% likelihood<\/a> of passing in 2026.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
CryptoSlate Daily Brief<\/span><\/p>\n

Daily signals, zero noise.<\/h3>\n

Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.<\/p>\n

5-minute digest<\/span> 100k+ readers<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.<\/p>\n

Whoops, looks like there was a problem. Please try again.<\/span><\/p>\n

You\u2019re subscribed. Welcome aboard.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Goldman Sachs<\/a> liquidated its entire $154 million XRP ETF position in the first quarter, a reminder that institutional positioning on XRP runs in both directions simultaneously.<\/p>\n

Two ways this resolves<\/h2>\n

In the bull case, ETF inflows continue to expand as the CLARITY Act advances<\/a> toward a floor vote, the 332,230 large-wallet holders who accumulated amid price weakness provide a bid at current levels, and Glassnode’s loss-realization ratio begins to recover as capitulating sellers exhaust their supply.<\/p>\n

XRP stabilizes above $1.00, network fees find a floor, and the ETF bid becomes visible in price.
Under that sequence, $0.90 stays a reference point on the chart where a multi-year rising trendline sits, with the ETF bid absorbing sell pressure before that level is reached.<\/p>\n

In the bear case, the Glassnode capitulation metrics persist long enough for the ETF bid to prove insufficient to defend the $1.00 psychological level. Loss-realization selling continues at a higher rate than profit-taking, network fees stay depressed, and the gap between institutional demand and organic on-chain demand widens further.<\/p>\n

If $1.00 fails, $0.90 becomes the next zone where accumulation would be tested, roughly 19% below current prices and near the cost basis of long-term holders who built positions through the 2024-2025 cycle.<\/p>\n

Polymarket’s June crowd prices the bear case as the most probable outcome, assigning a 47% probability to XRP losing $1.00 before month-end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Scenario<\/th>\nWhat needs to happen<\/th>\nKey level<\/th>\nConfirmation signal<\/th>\nMarket meaning<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Bull case: ETF bid absorbs supply<\/strong><\/td>\nETF inflows continue, CLARITY odds improve, and loss-realization pressure fades.<\/td>\nAbove $1.00<\/strong><\/td>\nRealized profit\/loss ratio rises from 0.38, fees stabilize, ETF inflows remain positive.<\/td>\nXRP forms a floor before testing $0.90.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Base case: weak range chop<\/strong><\/td>\nETF demand persists, but organic network activity remains depressed.<\/td>\n$1.00\u2013$1.11<\/strong><\/td>\nPrice fails to reclaim higher levels, but $1.00 holds.<\/td>\nETF demand offsets selling, but does not create a rally.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bear case: $1.00 breaks<\/strong><\/td>\nCapitulation metrics persist and ETF inflows are absorbed by spot selling.<\/td>\n$0.90<\/strong><\/td>\nXRP loses $1.00, fees remain near lows, realized losses keep dominating.<\/td>\n$0.90 becomes the next accumulation test.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Stress case: ETF bid reverses<\/strong><\/td>\nETF outflows, broader crypto weakness, or CLARITY failure hits during capitulation.<\/td>\nBelow $0.90<\/strong><\/td>\nETF demand turns negative and large exchange inflows rise.<\/td>\nXRP shifts from reset risk to structural breakdown risk.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

ETF inflows show that regulated buyers exist and have been accumulating at steadily lower prices. Glassnode’s data shows that spot holders are capitulating, and organic network demand has contracted sharply.<\/p>\n

Both conditions can coexist until one overwhelms the other, and at a 90-day realized profit-to-loss ratio of 0.38, the capitulation arithmetic still has further to run.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

XRP is trading at $1.11, down roughly 17% from its June opening, having set a new 2026 low on June 5 and shed $8 billion in market cap over three sessions. The correction happens as the asset posted its strongest ETF inflow month of the year, with $131.94 million captured in May, ahead of both […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":430469,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[230,225,221,227,226,228,229,60,223,224,222],"class_list":["post-430468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cryptocurrency","tag-brave","tag-coinbase","tag-crypto","tag-decentralised","tag-decentralized","tag-decentralized-exchange","tag-erc-20","tag-featured","tag-meme-coin","tag-robinhood","tag-solana"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/430468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=430468"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/430468\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":430470,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/430468\/revisions\/430470"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/430469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=430468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=430468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dripp.zone\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=430468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}